Daniel A. Baugh

960 citations
32 papers · 382 · h-index 11

Impact in

  • History top 1%
    • Scottish History and National Identity
    • Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
    • Colonialism, slavery, and trade

Papers in

Daniel A. Baugh

26 papers receiving 248 citations

Peers

Daniel A. Baugh
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • History 123
  • Anthropology 84
  • Economics and Econometrics 186
  • History and Philosophy of Science 26
  • Museology 13
Replace Jan Glete with:
Jan Glete Sweden
Richard A. Goldthwaite United States
Frédéric Mauro France
John Smail United States
H. V. Bowen United Kingdom
Boyd Hilton United Kingdom
John Morrill United Kingdom
Richard Grassby South Korea
Franklin F. Mendels United States
Daniel Waley United Kingdom
Daniel A. Baugh relative to Jan Glete Sweden Jan Glete's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.5×
Jan Glete · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel A. Baugh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel A. Baugh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel A. Baugh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel A. Baugh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel A. Baugh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel A. Baugh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel A. Baugh. The network helps show where Daniel A. Baugh may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Daniel A. Baugh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel A. Baugh Line = papers co-authored together Daniel A. Baugh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198772
2 196654
3 197443
4 198829
5 197624
6 197523
7 198419
8 196616
9 199413
10 197111
11 197711
12 196710
13 19989
14 19969
15 19668
16 19735
17 19915
18 19684
19 19783
20 20143

About Daniel A. Baugh

Daniel A. Baugh is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Archeology, Political Science and International Relations, History and Anthropology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 382 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Economic and Social Studies (12 papers), Maritime and Coastal Archaeology (7 papers), Historical Studies on Spain (4 papers), Colonialism, slavery, and trade (4 papers), Historical Influence and Diplomacy (3 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (3 papers), Maritime Security and History (2 papers) and Global Maritime and Colonial Histories (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (123 citations), Anthropology (84 citations), Economics and Econometrics (186 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (26 citations) and Museology (13 citations). Daniel A. Baugh has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include N. A. M. Rodger, Jean Dunbabin, John W. Cell, Peter G. Earle, John Brewer, Ian K. Steele and Jon Tetsuro Sumida. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, The International History Review, The Economic History Review and The William and Mary Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact