Dania Comparcini

48 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Dania Comparcini
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Research and Theory 78
  • Occupational Therapy 95
  • Emergency Medical Services 146
  • Leadership and Management 24
  • Health 100
Replace Valentina Simonetti with:
Valentina Simonetti Italy
Samantha Pang Hong Kong
Marianne Baernholdt United States
Hanna Admi Israel
Deborah Tregunno Canada
Giovanna Artioli Italy
Giuseppe Aleo Italy
Philippa Seaton New Zealand
Valentina Bressan Italy
Alessandro Stievano Italy
Dania Comparcini relative to Valentina Simonetti Italy Valentina Simonetti's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Valentina Simonetti · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dania Comparcini

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dania Comparcini's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dania Comparcini with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dania Comparcini more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dania Comparcini

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dania Comparcini. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dania Comparcini. The network helps show where Dania Comparcini may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dania Comparcini, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dania Comparcini Line = papers co-authored together Dania Comparcini links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013263
2 2015106
3 201482
4 201382
5 202167
6 201354
7 202349
8 201547
9 201543
10 202235
11 202132
12 201827
13 202326
14 201524
15 202423
16 201821
17 202221
18 201518
19 201516
20 202213

About Dania Comparcini

Dania Comparcini is a scholar working on Health, Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, having authored 53 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (11 papers), Nursing education and management (4 papers), Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis (3 papers), Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment (3 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (3 papers), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (2 papers), COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction (2 papers) and Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (78 citations), Occupational Therapy (95 citations), Emergency Medical Services (146 citations), Leadership and Management (24 citations) and Health (100 citations). Dania Comparcini has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United Kingdom and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Giancarlo Cicolini, Valentina Simonetti, Marco Tomietto, Maria Elena Flacco, Pamela Di Giovanni, Lamberto Manzoli, Lorenzo Capasso, Beth Nichol, Pasquale Stefanizzi and Marco Bucci. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Nursing, Journal of Advanced Nursing, International Journal of Nursing Studies, Journal of Nursing Scholarship and Applied Nursing Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact