Dana Hamam

736 citations
12 papers · 595 · h-index 7

Impact in

    • MicroRNA in disease regulation
    • Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
    • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
    • Circular RNAs in diseases
    • Extracellular vesicles in disease
    • RNA Interference and Gene Delivery

Papers in

Dana Hamam

12 papers receiving 589 citations

Peers

Dana Hamam
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Cancer Research 360
  • Molecular Biology 396
  • Genetics 32
  • Oncology 76
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 15
Replace Yu Liang with:
Yu Liang China
Puxiang Chen China
Saibyasachi N. Choudhury United States
Xinghong Yao China
Zenia Tiang Singapore
Phatchanat Klaihmon Thailand
Guoqi Song China
Mengying Cui China
Natsuyo Noguchi Japan
Dana Hamam relative to Yu Liang China Yu Liang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×23×
Yu Liang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dana Hamam

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dana Hamam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dana Hamam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dana Hamam more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dana Hamam

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dana Hamam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dana Hamam. The network helps show where Dana Hamam may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dana Hamam, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dana Hamam Line = papers co-authored together Dana Hamam links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2017289
2 2014120
3 201460
4 201751
5 201638
6 202118
7 20206
8 20166
9 20223
10 20252
11 20161
12 20241

About Dana Hamam

Dana Hamam is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cancer Research, Oncology, Genetics and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 12 papers that have together received 595 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include MicroRNA in disease regulation (5 papers), Circular RNAs in diseases (4 papers), Cancer Cells and Metastasis (3 papers), Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors (2 papers), Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (2 papers), Mesenchymal stem cell research (2 papers), Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research (2 papers) and Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (360 citations), Molecular Biology (396 citations), Genetics (32 citations), Oncology (76 citations) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (15 citations). Dana Hamam has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Saudi Arabia and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Abdullah Aldahmash, Moustapha Kassem, Nehad M. Alajez, Rimi Hamam, Musaad Alfayez, Khalid Alsaleh, Dalia Ali, Vincenzo Arena, Goffredo Arena and Mohamed Abdouh. Their work appears in journals such as Cell Death and Disease, Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research, Oncogenesis, Stem Cells and Development and Frontiers in Endocrinology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact