Dan W. Joyce

1.7k citations
59 papers · 934 · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Dan W. Joyce

48 papers receiving 908 citations

Peers

Dan W. Joyce
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Biological Psychiatry 73
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 310
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 195
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 203
  • Applied Psychology 42
Replace Tiziano Colibazzi with:
Tiziano Colibazzi United States
Cumhur Taş Türkiye
Georgia Koppe Germany
Mariya V. Cherkasova United States
Guangrong Xie China
Susan Whitfield United States
Mihai Avram Germany
Xiaowei Jiang China
Kangcheng Wang China
Iveta Fajnerová Czechia
Dan W. Joyce relative to Tiziano Colibazzi United States Tiziano Colibazzi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Tiziano Colibazzi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dan W. Joyce

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dan W. Joyce's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan W. Joyce with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan W. Joyce more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dan W. Joyce

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan W. Joyce. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan W. Joyce. The network helps show where Dan W. Joyce may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dan W. Joyce, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dan W. Joyce Line = papers co-authored together Dan W. Joyce links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018107
2 201292
3 200584
4 201369
5 201552
6 201842
7 200941
8 201938
9 201938
10 201238
11 201432
12 201631
13 202124
14
SoFAR with DIM Agents: An agent framework for Distributed Information Management
200023
15 201322
16 202021
17 201719
18 202418
19 201512
20 199912

About Dan W. Joyce

Dan W. Joyce is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 59 papers that have together received 934 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (15 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (10 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (6 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (4 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (4 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (4 papers), Topic Modeling (3 papers) and Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (73 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (310 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (195 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (203 citations) and Applied Psychology (42 citations). Dan W. Joyce has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Sukhwinder S. Shergill, Lydia Krabbendam, Anne‐Kathrin Fett, Paula M. Gromann, Chris Frith, Philip McGuire, Alexis E. Cullen, Rebekah Wigton, Antonia F. de C. Hamilton and Derek K. Tracy. Their work appears in journals such as The British Journal of Psychiatry, Psychological Medicine, Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, JAMA Psychiatry and Brain.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact