Thomas Dannhauser
Impact in
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Papers in
-
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research 8
- Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder 1
-
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies 5
- Co-authors
- Zuzana Walker (9 shared papers)Sukhwinder S. Shergill (6 shared papers)Joanne Rodda (4 shared papers)Tim Stevens (4 shared papers)Lean Lee (2 shared papers)Marc L. Seal (2 shared papers)Nada Philip (2 shared papers)Tim Whitfield (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Cortex (2 papers)European Psychiatry (2 papers)Alzheimer s & Dementia (1 paper)Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare (1 paper)BMC Psychiatry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaTürkiye
In The Last Decade
Thomas Dannhauser
12 papers receiving 449 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Psychiatry and Mental health 282
- Cognitive Neuroscience 235
- Neurology 55
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 65
- Rehabilitation 25
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Dannhauser
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Dannhauser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Dannhauser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Dannhauser more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Dannhauser
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Dannhauser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Dannhauser. The network helps show where Thomas Dannhauser may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 17 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Dannhauser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 77 | |
| 2 | 2005 | 72 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 71 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 54 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 40 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 38 | |
| 7 | 2009 | 32 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 26 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 17 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 16 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 10 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 4 |
About Thomas Dannhauser
Thomas Dannhauser is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Physiology, General Health Professions and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 457 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (8 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (5 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (3 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (1 paper), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (1 paper), Multisensory perception and integration (1 paper), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (1 paper) and Big Data and Business Intelligence (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (282 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (235 citations), Neurology (55 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (65 citations) and Rehabilitation (25 citations). Thomas Dannhauser has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Türkiye. Frequent co-authors include Zuzana Walker, Sukhwinder S. Shergill, Joanne Rodda, Tim Stevens, Lean Lee, Marc L. Seal, Nada Philip, Tim Whitfield, Ben Fletcher and Melissa Lamar. Their work appears in journals such as Cortex, European Psychiatry, Alzheimer s & Dementia, Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare and BMC Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.