Mark Weal

150 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers

Mark Weal
Comparison fields: 5 of 151
  • Human-Computer Interaction 421
  • Applied Psychology 155
  • Information Systems 746
  • Computer Science Applications 154
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 401
Replace Judith Masthoff with:
Judith Masthoff United Kingdom
Jeff Huang United States
Shlomo Berkovsky Australia
Jesús Favela Mexico
Dakuo Wang United States
Kelly Caine United States
Junehwa Song South Korea
Deborah Richards Australia
Blaine Price United Kingdom
Vanessa Evers Netherlands
Mark Weal relative to Judith Masthoff United Kingdom Judith Masthoff's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Judith Masthoff · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Weal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Weal's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Weal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Weal more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Weal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Weal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Weal. The network helps show where Mark Weal may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Weal, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Weal Line = papers co-authored together Mark Weal links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 152 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003286
2 2004210
3 2005204
4 2014137
5 2017112
6 201876
7 202171
8 201468
9 201864
10 201251
11 201849
12 201742
13
Using Hidden Markov Models for Iterative Non-intrusive Appliance Monitoring
201141
14 201840
15 200940
16 200639
17
Artequakt: Generating Tailored Biographies from Automatically Annotated Fragments from the Web
200237
18 201035
19 201834
20 200633

About Mark Weal

Mark Weal is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Sociology and Political Science, Information Systems, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Human-Computer Interaction, having authored 152 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Semantic Web and Ontologies (23 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (16 papers), Mobile Learning in Education (14 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (12 papers), Digital Games and Media (11 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (9 papers), Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems (9 papers) and Multimedia Communication and Technology (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (421 citations), Applied Psychology (155 citations), Information Systems (746 citations), Computer Science Applications (154 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (401 citations). Mark Weal has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include David E. Millard, Geraldine Fitzpatrick, Oliver Parson, Siddhartha Ghosh, Alex Rogers, Lucy Yardley, Paul Lewis, Wendy Hall, Cliff Randell and Sara Price. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medical Internet Research, PLoS ONE, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia and International journal of communication.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact