Dan Marshall

418 citations
19 papers · 282 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Dan Marshall

18 papers receiving 236 citations

Peers

Dan Marshall
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • History and Philosophy of Science 101
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 144
  • Philosophy 107
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 19
  • Theoretical Computer Science 5
Replace Peter Forrest with:
Peter Forrest Australia
Thomas Tymoczko United States
Artur Rojszczak Poland
Ole Thomassen Hjortland Norway
Luca Incurvati Netherlands
Jeffrey Sanford Russell United States
Antony Eagle Australia
John Bacon United States
A. J. Cotnoir United Kingdom
Ken Akiba United States
Dan Marshall relative to Peter Forrest Australia Peter Forrest's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Peter Forrest · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dan Marshall

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dan Marshall's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan Marshall with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan Marshall more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dan Marshall

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan Marshall. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan Marshall. The network helps show where Dan Marshall may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Dan Marshall, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dan Marshall Line = papers co-authored together Dan Marshall links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1
Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic Properties
200285
2 201537
3 201530
4 201320
5 199919
6 200118
7
A puzzle for modal realism
201611
8 201411
9 20159
10 20099
11 20129
12 20137
13 20025
14 20214
15 20012
16 20142
17 20232
18 20202
19 20210

About Dan Marshall

Dan Marshall is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Artificial Intelligence and Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, having authored 19 papers that have together received 282 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (13 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (6 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (6 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (5 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 papers), Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (2 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (2 papers) and Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (101 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (144 citations), Philosophy (107 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (19 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (5 citations). Dan Marshall has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Josh Parsons, Jillian Pooler, Richard Byng, Cath Quinn, Nicole A. Pelot, Warren M. Grill, Christopher Davis and Andrew J. Shoffstall. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Philosophy Compass, Philosophical Studies, Synthese and Noûs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact