Dan Marshall
Impact in
-
- Philosophy and History of Science
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Papers in
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 13
-
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 6
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 3
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 2
- Co-authors
- Josh Parsons (2 shared papers)Cath Quinn (1 shared paper)Jillian Pooler (1 shared paper)Richard Byng (1 shared paper)Andrew J. Shoffstall (1 shared paper)Warren M. Grill (1 shared paper)Nicole A. Pelot (1 shared paper)Christopher Davis (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (5 papers)Philosophical Studies (2 papers)Philosophy Compass (2 papers)Synthese (1 paper)Noûs (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- Hong KongAustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Dan Marshall
17 papers receiving 223 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- History and Philosophy of Science 91
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 133
- Philosophy 94
- Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 18
- Theoretical Computer Science 4
Countries citing papers authored by Dan Marshall
This map shows the geographic impact of Dan Marshall's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan Marshall with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan Marshall more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dan Marshall
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan Marshall. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan Marshall. The network helps show where Dan Marshall may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 8 scholars most cited alongside Dan Marshall, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic Properties | 2002 | 72 |
| 2 | 2015 | 36 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 28 | |
| 4 | 1999 | 19 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 19 | |
| 6 | 2001 | 15 | |
| 7 | A puzzle for modal realism | 2016 | 11 |
| 8 | 2014 | 10 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 9 | |
| 11 | 2009 | 8 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2002 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2001 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2021 | 0 |
About Dan Marshall
Dan Marshall is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Artificial Intelligence and Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, having authored 18 papers that have together received 254 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (13 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (6 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (6 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (5 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (2 papers), Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics (2 papers) and Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (91 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (133 citations), Philosophy (94 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (18 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (4 citations). Dan Marshall has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Josh Parsons, Cath Quinn, Jillian Pooler, Richard Byng, Andrew J. Shoffstall, Warren M. Grill, Nicole A. Pelot and Christopher Davis. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Philosophical Studies, Philosophy Compass, Synthese and Noûs.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.