Dan M. Thomas

5.1k citations
165 papers · 4.5k · h-index 35

Impact in

Papers in

Dan M. Thomas

158 papers receiving 4.3k citations

Peers

Dan M. Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 145
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 3.5k
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 1.3k
  • Materials Chemistry 2.0k
  • Aerospace Engineering 788
  • Biomedical Engineering 895
Replace John Hogan with:
John Hogan United States
Thomas J. Johnson United Kingdom
Christopher L. Jones United States
Yong Kyun Kim South Korea
Frank Peter Stephan Germany
Alan Schwartz Japan
T. B. Jones United States
Kris Hagel United States
R. Pearce France
Robert A. Ellis United States
Dan M. Thomas relative to John Hogan United States John Hogan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
John Hogan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dan M. Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dan M. Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan M. Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan M. Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dan M. Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan M. Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan M. Thomas. The network helps show where Dan M. Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dan M. Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dan M. Thomas Line = papers co-authored together Dan M. Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 165 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1988523
2 1995249
3 2001168
4 1994157
5 1971128
6 1996125
7 2005120
8 2005107
9 198783
10 202175
11 200071
12 200169
13 201965
14 200363
15 199763
16 200061
17 200459
18 200456
19 201754
20 200152

About Dan M. Thomas

Dan M. Thomas is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Materials Chemistry, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Aerospace Engineering and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 165 papers that have together received 4.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (139 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (86 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (40 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (40 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (37 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (24 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (14 papers) and Nuclear Materials and Properties (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (3.5k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (1.3k citations), Materials Chemistry (2.0k citations), Aerospace Engineering (788 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (895 citations). Dan M. Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and China. Frequent co-authors include Bruce McKeown, Richard J. Groebner, Keith H. Burrell, Anthony Leonard, P. Gohil, Lang L. Lao, Thomas Osborne, Thomas N. Carlstrom, William P. West and E. J. Doyle. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Fusion, Review of Scientific Instruments, Physics of Plasmas, Nuclear Materials and Energy and Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact