N.H. Brooks

5.7k citations
146 papers · 3.0k · h-index 31

Impact in

Papers in

N.H. Brooks

142 papers receiving 2.9k citations

Peers

N.H. Brooks
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 2.5k
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 644
  • Materials Chemistry 1.8k
  • Aerospace Engineering 422
  • Biomedical Engineering 611
Replace ASDEX Upgrade Team with:
ASDEX Upgrade Team Germany
D. N. Hill United States
N.J. Lopes Cardozo Netherlands
B. Unterberg Germany
P.B. Parks United States
E.M. Hollmann United States
D. K. Mansfield United States
M. Groth Finland
J.H. Yu United States
M. Beurskens Germany
N.H. Brooks relative to ASDEX Upgrade Team Germany ASDEX Upgrade Team's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
ASDEX Upgrade Team · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by N.H. Brooks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of N.H. Brooks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N.H. Brooks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N.H. Brooks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by N.H. Brooks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by N.H. Brooks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N.H. Brooks. The network helps show where N.H. Brooks may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside N.H. Brooks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with N.H. Brooks Line = papers co-authored together N.H. Brooks links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 146 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006192
2 201383
3 200578
4 200375
5 195870
6 199770
7 198262
8 198161
9 201059
10 199758
11 200358
12 200257
13 200657
14 199756
15 199755
16 198654
17 199853
18 200753
19 198350
20 200746

About N.H. Brooks

N.H. Brooks is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Materials Chemistry, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Biomedical Engineering and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 146 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (132 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (89 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (35 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (26 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (23 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (16 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (13 papers) and Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (2.5k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (644 citations), Materials Chemistry (1.8k citations), Aerospace Engineering (422 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (611 citations). N.H. Brooks has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include W.P. West, M.E. Fenstermacher, R. J. Groebner, R. C. Isler, A.W. Leonard, M. Groth, J.G. Watkins, A.G. McLean, D.G. Whyte and D.L. Rudakov. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Nuclear Materials, Nuclear Fusion, Review of Scientific Instruments, Physics of Plasmas and Physical Review Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact