Dan Edelstein

27 papers receiving 407 citations

Peers

Dan Edelstein
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • History and Philosophy of Science 51
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology 35
  • History 88
  • Control and Systems Engineering 174
  • Anthropology 47
Replace Walter Scott with:
Walter Scott Portugal
Jyotsna G. Singh India
Jack Goody United Kingdom
Michael S. Goodman United Kingdom
Richard L. Hills United Kingdom
Michael Chapman South Africa
Steve Reece United Kingdom
Frank Hoffmann United States
Benjamín Fraser United States
Paul McNamara United States
Dan Edelstein relative to Walter Scott Portugal Walter Scott's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.6×
Walter Scott · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dan Edelstein

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dan Edelstein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan Edelstein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan Edelstein more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dan Edelstein

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan Edelstein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan Edelstein. The network helps show where Dan Edelstein may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Dan Edelstein, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dan Edelstein Line = papers co-authored together Dan Edelstein links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993202
2 201042
3 201038
4 201133
5 201732
6 200930
7 201517
8 201917
9 20189
10 20149
11 20188
12
How Is Innovation Taught? On the Humanities and the Knowledge Economy.
20107
13 20087
14 20165
15
Chronocenosis: An Introduction to Power and Time
20204
16 20214
17
The super-enlightenment : daring to know too much
20103
18 20163
19 20183
20 20062

About Dan Edelstein

Dan Edelstein is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, History, History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 34 papers that have together received 486 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (9 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (7 papers), European Political History Analysis (7 papers), Political Theory and Influence (6 papers), Political Theology and Sovereignty (3 papers), Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (3 papers), Rousseau and Enlightenment Thought (2 papers) and Historical and Literary Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (51 citations), Energy Engineering and Power Technology (35 citations), History (88 citations), Control and Systems Engineering (174 citations) and Anthropology (47 citations). Dan Edelstein has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Moshe Blau, D. Kottick, Natasha Wheatley, Stefanos Geroulanos, Paula Findlen, Caroline Winterer, Benjamin Straumann, Kaitlyn Zhou, Haishan Gao and Dan Jurafsky. Their work appears in journals such as Modern Intellectual History, The Journal of Modern History, Journal of the History of Ideas, French Historical Studies and IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact