Steve Reece

21 papers receiving 228 citations

Peers

Steve Reece
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Human-Computer Interaction 38
  • Anthropology 60
  • Archeology 37
  • Religious studies 17
  • Computer Science Applications 17
Replace Kim H. Veltman with:
Kim H. Veltman Netherlands
Raúl R. Romero Peru
Minica Houry-Panchetti Italy
Giusy Fiucci United Kingdom
David Cooper United Kingdom
Michael Boyd United States
Christopher Bonfield United Kingdom
Emily Anderson United States
Ian Muehlenhaus United States
Manish Thakur India
Steve Reece relative to Kim H. Veltman Netherlands Kim H. Veltman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.6×
Kim H. Veltman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Steve Reece

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steve Reece's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steve Reece with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steve Reece more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steve Reece

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steve Reece. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steve Reece. The network helps show where Steve Reece may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Steve Reece, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Steve Reece Line = papers co-authored together Steve Reece links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201562
2 199345
3 201330
4 201525
5 200822
6 201519
7 199418
8 201313
9 20098
10
Homer’s Asphodel Meadow
20107
11 20117
12
The three circuits of the suitors : a ring composition in Odyssey 17-22
20184
13 20174
14 20163
15 20093
16
The Myth of Milman Parry: Ajax or Elpenor?
20192
17 20222
18 20022
19
AgentSwitch: towards smart electricity tariff selection
20132
20 20251

About Steve Reece

Steve Reece is a scholar working on Anthropology, Archeology, Religious studies, Sociology and Political Science and Language and Linguistics, having authored 27 papers that have together received 283 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (7 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (6 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (5 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (4 papers), Linguistics and language evolution (3 papers), Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing (3 papers), Smart Grid Energy Management (3 papers) and Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (38 citations), Anthropology (60 citations), Archeology (37 citations), Religious studies (17 citations) and Computer Science Applications (17 citations). Steve Reece has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Saudi Arabia. Frequent co-authors include Nicholas R. Jennings, Joel E. Fischer, Tom Rodden, Sarvapali D. Ramchurn, Stephen Roberts, Feng Wu, Chris Greenhalgh, Trung Dong Huynh, Oliver Parson and David Jones. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Philology, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, Classical Philology, New Testament Studies and ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact