The Journal of Modern History

1.9k papers and 8.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.9k papers published in The Journal of Modern History in the last decades have received a total of 8.8k indexed citations. Papers published in The Journal of Modern History usually cover Political Science and International Relations (842 papers), History (789 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (635 papers) specifically the topics of European Political History Analysis (403 papers), European history and politics (253 papers) and Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (237 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Journal of Modern History are Marshall Sahlins, J. G. A. Pocock, Sheila Fitzpatrick, Terry Martin, Peter Holquist, William H. Sewell, Steve Pincus, Harold Mah, Ronald Grigor Suny and Theda Skocpol.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Journal of Modern History

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Journal of Modern History. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Journal of Modern History.

Countries where authors publish in The Journal of Modern History

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Journal of Modern History. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Journal of Modern History with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Journal of Modern History more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025