French Historical Studies

1.0k papers and 3.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.0k papers published in French Historical Studies in the last decades have received a total of 3.1k indexed citations. Papers published in French Historical Studies usually cover History (652 papers), History and Philosophy of Science (608 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (192 papers) specifically the topics of Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (601 papers), European Political History Analysis (412 papers) and French Historical and Cultural Studies (259 papers). The most active scholars publishing in French Historical Studies are Sarah Hanley, Susan Carol Rogers, Patricia M. E. Lorcin, Daniel J. Sherman, Suzanne Desan, Olwen Hufton, Harry Paul, David A. Bell, Sharon Kettering and Michèle Lamont.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in French Historical Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in French Historical Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in French Historical Studies.

Countries where authors publish in French Historical Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in French Historical Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in French Historical Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites French Historical Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025