Infant Behavior and Development

3.4k papers and 83.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.4k papers published in Infant Behavior and Development in the last decades have received a total of 83.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Infant Behavior and Development usually cover Developmental and Educational Psychology (1.3k papers), Clinical Psychology (988 papers) and Social Psychology (863 papers) specifically the topics of Child and Animal Learning Development (968 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (833 papers) and Infant Health and Development (675 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Infant Behavior and Development are Tiffany Field, Janet F. Werker, Anne Fernald, Maria A. Gartstein, Richard C. Tees, Mary K. Rothbart, Miguel Diego, Maria Hernandez‐Reif, Patricia K. Kuhl and Marc H. Bornstein.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Infant Behavior and Development

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Infant Behavior and Development. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Infant Behavior and Development.

Countries where authors publish in Infant Behavior and Development

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Infant Behavior and Development. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Infant Behavior and Development with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Infant Behavior and Development more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025