Tom Hollenstein

6.4k citations
111 papers · 4.5k · h-index 38

Impact in

Papers in

Tom Hollenstein

105 papers receiving 4.3k citations

Peers

Tom Hollenstein
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
  • Clinical Psychology 2.4k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.4k
  • Applied Psychology 386
  • Social Psychology 1.5k
  • Education 865
Replace Lisa Sheeber with:
Lisa Sheeber United States
Karla Van Leeuwen Belgium
Natalie D. Eggum United States
P.A.C. van Lier Netherlands
Jennifer L. Tackett United States
Scott N. Compton United States
Marie B. H. Yap Australia
Emily A. Butler United States
Adriano Schimmenti Italy
Brad E. Sheese United States
Tom Hollenstein relative to Lisa Sheeber United States Lisa Sheeber's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Lisa Sheeber · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tom Hollenstein

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Hollenstein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Hollenstein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Hollenstein more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Hollenstein

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Hollenstein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Hollenstein. The network helps show where Tom Hollenstein may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tom Hollenstein, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tom Hollenstein Line = papers co-authored together Tom Hollenstein links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 111 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004226
2 2016192
3 2003173
4 2003172
5 2007169
6 2013154
7 2011150
8 2010140
9 2012135
10 2009125
11 2018121
12 2021121
13 2006117
14 2015111
15 2013110
16 201296
17 201290
18 201988
19 201483
20 201777

About Tom Hollenstein

Tom Hollenstein is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Education and Applied Psychology, having authored 111 papers that have together received 4.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (55 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (33 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (24 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (18 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (12 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (11 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (8 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (2.4k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.4k citations), Applied Psychology (386 citations), Social Psychology (1.5k citations) and Education (865 citations). Tom Hollenstein has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Isabela Granic, Jessica P. Lougheed, Kalee De France, Jessica J. Flynn, Anna Lichtwarck‐Aschoff, Peter Koval, Marc D. Lewis, Jennifer M. Eastabrook, Mike Stoolmiller and James Snyder. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Research on Adolescence, Developmental Psychology, Emotion, Personality and Individual Differences and Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact