Daı́se Lopes

22 papers receiving 481 citations

Peers

Daı́se Lopes
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Food Science 244
  • Pharmacology 68
  • Plant Science 302
  • Filtration and Separation 16
  • Biochemistry 44
Replace R. de C. A. Pereira with:
R. de C. A. Pereira Brazil
Wirginia Janiszowska Poland
Rosilene Aparecida de Oliveira Brazil
Luciana Atti Serafini Brazil
Vanderlúcia Fonseca de Paula Brazil
Olı́via Matos Portugal
Tahsin Karadoğan Türkiye
José Mauricio Peñarrieta Bolivia
Marija Škrinjar Serbia
Renata M. S. Celeghini Brazil
Daı́se Lopes relative to R. de C. A. Pereira Brazil R. de C. A. Pereira's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×
R. de C. A. Pereira · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daı́se Lopes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daı́se Lopes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daı́se Lopes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daı́se Lopes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daı́se Lopes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daı́se Lopes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daı́se Lopes. The network helps show where Daı́se Lopes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daı́se Lopes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daı́se Lopes Line = papers co-authored together Daı́se Lopes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999103
2 200699
3 200048
4 200137
5 200031
6 200027
7 200527
8 200426
9 200822
10 200421
11 200720
12 199717
13 200316
14 199310
15 20018
16 19995
17 20055
18
Caracterizacao quimica dos frutos do mapati (Pourouma cecropiifolia Martius - Moraceae)
19994
19 20054
20 20034

About Daı́se Lopes

Daı́se Lopes is a scholar working on Food Science, Plant Science, Biochemistry, Forestry and Biochemistry, having authored 22 papers that have together received 538 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (11 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (6 papers), Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (3 papers), Phytochemistry Medicinal Plant Applications (3 papers), Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (3 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (3 papers), Ginger and Zingiberaceae research (2 papers) and Edible Oils Quality and Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Food Science (244 citations), Pharmacology (68 citations), Plant Science (302 citations), Filtration and Separation (16 citations) and Biochemistry (44 citations). Daı́se Lopes has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, United States and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Maria Auxiliadora Coelho Kaplan, J. P. P. Carauta, H. R. Bizzo, Gilda Guimarães Leitão, Suzana Guimarães Leitão, Danilo Ribeiro de Oliveira, Paul P. Kolodziejczyk, Celuta Sales Alviano, Ronoel Luiz de Oliveira Godóy and José Vladimir de Oliveira. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Ethnopharmacology, Phytochemistry, Planta Medica, Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society and Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact