Countries where authors publish in Phytochemical Analysis
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Phytochemical Analysis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Phytochemical Analysis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phytochemical Analysis more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Phytochemical Analysis
This network shows the impact of papers published in Phytochemical Analysis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Phytochemical Analysis.
About Phytochemical Analysis
The 2.4k papers published in Phytochemical Analysis in the last decades have received a total of 55.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Phytochemical Analysis usually cover Biochemistry (337 papers), Complementary and alternative medicine (408 papers), Analytical Chemistry (388 papers), Pharmacology (338 papers) and Food Science (423 papers) specifically the topics of Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (477 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (335 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (309 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (290 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (249 papers), Chromatography in Natural Products (246 papers), Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis (237 papers) and Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (170 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Phytochemical Analysis are Robert Verpoorte, Teris A. van Beek, Philippe Christen, C.P.G.M. de Groot, J.P.H. Linssen, L. Evstatieva, Irina Koleva, Béatrice Kaufmann, Guido F. Pauli and Irene Perrone.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.