Dagmar Schoder
Impact in
- Biotechnology top 0.5%
- Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety
- Microbial Inactivation Methods
- Food Science top 1%
- Food Safety and Hygiene
- Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
- Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
Papers in
-
- Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety 31
- Microbial Inactivation Methods 11
- Food Science 29
- Food Safety and Hygiene 16
- Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology 14
- Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity 4
- Co-authors
- Martin Wagner (25 shared papers)Peter Rossmanith (19 shared papers)Anna Kristina Witte (13 shared papers)Susanne Fister (11 shared papers)Patrick Mester (14 shared papers)Christian Robben (5 shared papers)Beatrix Stessl (9 shared papers)P. Winter (4 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Dagmar Schoder
46 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
- Biotechnology 546
- Food Science 602
- Endocrinology 126
- Ecology 230
- Microbiology 50
Countries citing papers authored by Dagmar Schoder
This map shows the geographic impact of Dagmar Schoder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dagmar Schoder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dagmar Schoder more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dagmar Schoder
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dagmar Schoder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dagmar Schoder. The network helps show where Dagmar Schoder may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dagmar Schoder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 118 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 60 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 55 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 55 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 53 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 52 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 51 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 50 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 50 | |
| 10 | 2004 | 49 | |
| 11 | 2003 | 40 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 38 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 37 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 36 | |
| 15 | 2003 | 33 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 33 | |
| 17 | 2022 | 31 | |
| 18 | 2010 | 31 | |
| 19 | 2014 | 29 | |
| 20 | 2005 | 27 |
About Dagmar Schoder
Dagmar Schoder is a scholar working on Biotechnology, Food Science, Molecular Biology, Infectious Diseases and Endocrinology, having authored 47 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety (31 papers), Food Safety and Hygiene (16 papers), Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (14 papers), Microbial Inactivation Methods (11 papers), Identification and Quantification in Food (6 papers), Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (4 papers), Biosensors and Analytical Detection (4 papers) and Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biotechnology (546 citations), Food Science (602 citations), Endocrinology (126 citations), Ecology (230 citations) and Microbiology (50 citations). Dagmar Schoder has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Germany and Greece. Frequent co-authors include Martin Wagner, Peter Rossmanith, Anna Kristina Witte, Susanne Fister, Patrick Mester, Christian Robben, Beatrix Stessl, P. Winter, Alois W. Schmalwieser and Walter Baumgartner. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Food Microbiology, Food Control, Journal of Food Protection, Foods and Frontiers in Microbiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.