D S Charney

2.7k citations
14 papers · 2.2k · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

D S Charney

14 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

D S Charney
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Biological Psychiatry 154
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 162
  • Clinical Psychology 859
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 665
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 412
Replace Peter F. Goyer with:
Peter F. Goyer United States
John Krystal United States
R. Bruce Lydiard United States
R.M. Post United States
Emanuela Mundo Italy
D.J. Nutt United Kingdom
Chris C. Streeter United States
Marc Branchey United States
Jean‐Philippe Boulenger France
David Feifel United States
D S Charney relative to Peter F. Goyer United States Peter F. Goyer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Peter F. Goyer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by D S Charney

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D S Charney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D S Charney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D S Charney more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D S Charney

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D S Charney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D S Charney. The network helps show where D S Charney may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside D S Charney, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with D S Charney Line = papers co-authored together D S Charney links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 1981306
2 1993288
3
Monoamine dysfunction and the pathophysiology and treatment of depression.
1998285
4 1996251
5 1988200
6 1981160
7 1991147
8 1980140
9
A controlled trial of lithium augmentation in fluvoxamine-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder: lack of efficacy.
1991126
10 199595
11 198791
12 199370
13 199441
14
Models of antidepressant action.
199910

About D S Charney

D S Charney is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Pharmacology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 14 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Treatment of Major Depression (4 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (3 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (3 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (3 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (2 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (2 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (1 paper) and Ion channel regulation and function (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (154 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (162 citations), Clinical Psychology (859 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (665 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (412 citations). D S Charney has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include J. Craig Nelson, George R. Heninger, J. Craig Nelson, Donald M. Quinlan, W K Goodman, Lawrence H. Price, Ned L. Cooney, John H. Krystal, Elizabeth Webb and Henry R. Kranzler. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, Synapse, PubMed and Archives of General Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact