D. Pitt
Impact in
- Plant Science top 2%
- Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
- Plant Pathogens and Resistance
- Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics
- Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls
- Cell Biology top 5%
- Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Papers in
-
- Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity 8
- Plant Pathogens and Resistance 8
- Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food 7
-
- Fungal and yeast genetics research 8
- Co-authors
- U. O. Ugalde (9 shared papers)Roland W.S. Weber (10 shared papers)Gavin E. Wakley (6 shared papers)Emma L. Tilston (3 shared papers)R. Charles Coombes (2 shared papers)Jonathan C. Barnes (10 shared papers)I. D. J. Phillips (2 shared papers)Keith Bailey (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Planta (6 papers)Antonie van Leeuwenhoek (6 papers)Plant Pathology (4 papers)Annals of Applied Biology (3 papers)Annals of Botany (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesSpain
In The Last Decade
D. Pitt
83 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
- Plant Science 921
- Cell Biology 298
- Pharmacology 212
- Biotechnology 96
- Food Science 159
Countries citing papers authored by D. Pitt
This map shows the geographic impact of D. Pitt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. Pitt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. Pitt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by D. Pitt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. Pitt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. Pitt. The network helps show where D. Pitt may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside D. Pitt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 84 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2002 | 77 | |
| 2 | 1984 | 56 | |
| 3 | Lysosomes and Cell Function | 1975 | 54 |
| 4 | 1991 | 53 | |
| 5 | 1988 | 51 | |
| 6 | 1990 | 49 | |
| 7 | 1971 | 40 | |
| 8 | 1981 | 39 | |
| 9 | 1978 | 38 | |
| 10 | 1968 | 37 | |
| 11 | 1972 | 36 | |
| 12 | 2002 | 36 | |
| 13 | 1969 | 35 | |
| 14 | 1964 | 34 | |
| 15 | 1983 | 32 | |
| 16 | 1999 | 31 | |
| 17 | 1968 | 29 | |
| 18 | 1990 | 26 | |
| 19 | 1976 | 24 | |
| 20 | 2000 | 24 |
About D. Pitt
D. Pitt is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, Pharmacology and Food Science, having authored 84 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (18 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (16 papers), Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (13 papers), Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (8 papers), Fungal and yeast genetics research (8 papers), Plant Pathogens and Resistance (8 papers), Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food (7 papers) and Potato Plant Research (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (921 citations), Cell Biology (298 citations), Pharmacology (212 citations), Biotechnology (96 citations) and Food Science (159 citations). D. Pitt has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include U. O. Ugalde, Roland W.S. Weber, Gavin E. Wakley, Emma L. Tilston, R. Charles Coombes, Jonathan C. Barnes, I. D. J. Phillips, Keith Bailey, Paul J. Kuhn and Unai Ugalde. Their work appears in journals such as Planta, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, Plant Pathology, Annals of Applied Biology and Annals of Botany.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.