D. A. Worcester
Impact in
-
- Global trade and economics
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Merger and Competition Analysis
- Economic theories and models
Papers in
-
- Economic theories and models 2
- Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets 1
- Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth 1
- Economic and Fiscal Studies 1
D. A. Worcester
16 papers receiving 135 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 24
- Economics and Econometrics 73
- Strategy and Management 30
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 24
- Education 50
Countries citing papers authored by D. A. Worcester
This map shows the geographic impact of D. A. Worcester's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. A. Worcester with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. A. Worcester more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by D. A. Worcester
This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. A. Worcester. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. A. Worcester. The network helps show where D. A. Worcester may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside D. A. Worcester, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1957 | 36 | |
| 2 | 1961 | 35 | |
| 3 | 1973 | 35 | |
| 4 | 1951 | 35 | |
| 5 | The education of children of above-average mentality | 1956 | 34 |
| 6 | 1969 | 11 | |
| 7 | On Monopoly Welfare Losses: Comment | 2016 | 5 |
| 8 | 1970 | 4 | |
| 9 | 1957 | 4 | |
| 10 | 1983 | 3 | |
| 11 | 1957 | 3 | |
| 12 | THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ADJUNCT AUTO-INSTRUCTION. | 1964 | 3 |
| 13 | 1986 | 2 | |
| 14 | 1956 | 2 | |
| 15 | On the Validity of Marginal Analysis for Policy Making | 1982 | 1 |
| 16 | 1958 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1957 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1974 | 1 | |
| 19 | Welfare gains from advertising: The problem of regulation | 1978 | 1 |
About D. A. Worcester
D. A. Worcester is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Safety Research and Accounting, having authored 19 papers that have together received 217 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic theories and models (2 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (1 paper), School Choice and Performance (1 paper), Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets (1 paper), Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management (1 paper), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (1 paper), Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis (1 paper) and Economic and Fiscal Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (24 citations), Economics and Econometrics (73 citations), Strategy and Management (30 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (24 citations) and Education (50 citations). D. A. Worcester has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include John Schmid, A. S. Barr and Joseph L. French. Their work appears in journals such as Exceptional Children, Contemporary Economic Policy, Journal of Educational Psychology, The Journal of Experimental Education and Administrative Science Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.