Contemporary Economic Policy

1.7k papers and 24.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.7k papers published in Contemporary Economic Policy in the last decades have received a total of 24.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Contemporary Economic Policy usually cover Economics and Econometrics (1.1k papers), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (364 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (279 papers) specifically the topics of Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (249 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (185 papers) and Global trade and economics (141 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Contemporary Economic Policy are Richard B. Howarth, Robert A. Lawson, Frank J. Chaloupka, Joshua C. Hall, Blanca Sánchez-Robles, Yaohui Zhao, Brad R. Humphreys, Dennis Coates, Kevin Honglin Zhang and Anna Alberini.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Contemporary Economic Policy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Contemporary Economic Policy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Contemporary Economic Policy.

Countries where authors publish in Contemporary Economic Policy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Contemporary Economic Policy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Contemporary Economic Policy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Contemporary Economic Policy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025