Cony Decock

6.8k citations
199 papers · 5.6k · 2 hit papers · h-index 36

Impact in

Papers in

Cony Decock

195 papers receiving 5.4k citations

Cony Decock's Hit Papers

Fusarium: more than a node or a foot-shaped basal cell 2021 · 291 citations
2910+2+4Years since publication100200300

Peers

Cony Decock
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Cell Biology 3.4k
  • Insect Science 1.4k
  • Pharmacology 718
  • Molecular Biology 2.1k
  • Plant Science 1.3k
Replace Yi‐Jian Yao with:
Yi‐Jian Yao China
Ting-Chi Wen China
Putarak Chomnunti Thailand
Saowaluck Tibpromma China
Kandawatte W. Thilini Chethana Thailand
Arun Kumar Dutta India
Chayanard Phukhamsakda Thailand
Sinang Hongsanan Thailand
Olivier Raspé Belgium
Roger Graham Shivas Australia
Cony Decock relative to Yi‐Jian Yao China Yi‐Jian Yao's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.8×
Yi‐Jian Yao · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cony Decock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cony Decock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cony Decock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cony Decock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cony Decock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cony Decock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cony Decock. The network helps show where Cony Decock may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Cony Decock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cony Decock Line = papers co-authored together Cony Decock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 199 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Notes, outline and divergence times of Basidiomycota
Hit paper breakdown →
2019377
2
Fusarium: more than a node or a foot-shaped basal cell
Hit paper breakdown →
2021291
3 2015233
4 2017226
5 2012198
6 2017176
7 2014173
8 2016160
9 2015130
10 2021121
11 2020114
12 2020101
13 200799
14 201497
15 201083
16 201580
17 202179
18 201371
19 200768
20 201259

About Cony Decock

Cony Decock is a scholar working on Cell Biology, Insect Science, Molecular Biology, Pharmacology and Plant Science, having authored 199 papers that have together received 5.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (139 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (90 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (78 papers), Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (17 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (17 papers), Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies (14 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (8 papers) and Genetic diversity and population structure (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cell Biology (3.4k citations), Insect Science (1.4k citations), Pharmacology (718 citations), Molecular Biology (2.1k citations) and Plant Science (1.3k citations). Cony Decock has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, China and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Mario Amalfi, Leif Ryvarden, Marc Stadler, Gabriel Natalio Castillo, Bao‐Kai Cui, Yu-Cheng Dai, Pedro Willem Crous, Gerardo Robledo, Quan Lü and Håvard Kauserud. Their work appears in journals such as Mycologia, Cryptogamie Mycologie, Mycological Progress, Persoonia - Molecular Phylogeny and Evolution of Fungi and MycoKeys.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact