John Dearnaley

6.3k citations
40 papers · 813 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

John Dearnaley

38 papers receiving 774 citations

Peers

John Dearnaley
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 462
  • Plant Science 512
  • Cell Biology 206
  • Physiology 35
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 74
Replace Chris H. Bornman with:
Chris H. Bornman South Africa
Barbara C. Turner United States
Bohumil Trávníček Czechia
Joseph L. Corriveau United States
Elizabeth G. Cutter United Kingdom
A. R. SHELDRAKE United Kingdom
Aaron H. Kennedy United States
Lenka Záveská Drábková Czechia
Emmanuel Gendreau France
Bingbing Liu China
John Dearnaley relative to Chris H. Bornman South Africa Chris H. Bornman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×17.5×
Chris H. Bornman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Dearnaley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Dearnaley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Dearnaley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Dearnaley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Dearnaley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Dearnaley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Dearnaley. The network helps show where John Dearnaley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Dearnaley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Dearnaley Line = papers co-authored together John Dearnaley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007250
2 201370
3 200066
4 200557
5 200144
6 200737
7 201026
8 201123
9 200622
10 199722
11 201022
12
The fungal endophytes of erythrorchis cassythoides - is this orchid saprophytic or parasitic?
200621
13
The Fungal Endophytes of Dipodium Variegatum (Orchidaceae)
200517
14 199616
15 201815
16 199913
17 202512
18 199611
19 19949
20 20069

About John Dearnaley

John Dearnaley is a scholar working on Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology, Cell Biology and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 40 papers that have together received 813 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (19 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (18 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (9 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (7 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (6 papers), Plant Reproductive Biology (4 papers), Plant Pathogens and Resistance (4 papers) and Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (462 citations), Plant Science (512 citations), Cell Biology (206 citations), Physiology (35 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (74 citations). John Dearnaley has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Jeremy Bougoure, Roger R. Lew, Rohan A. Davis, Michael Kotiw, John Cairney, Damian S. Bougoure, A. R. Hardham, I. Brent Heath, Daphne R. Goring and P. A. McGee. Their work appears in journals such as New Phytologist, Journal of Hazardous Materials, Mycorrhiza, Current Microbiology and PROTOPLASMA.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact