This map shows the geographic impact of research published in MycoKeys. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in MycoKeys with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites MycoKeys more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in MycoKeys. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in MycoKeys.
About MycoKeys
The 797 papers published in MycoKeys in the last decades have received a total of 7.9k indexed citations . Papers published in MycoKeys usually cover Cell Biology (616 papers), Plant Science (744 papers), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (314 papers), Pharmacology (155 papers) and Insect Science (50 papers) specifically the topics of Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (665 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (616 papers), Lichen and fungal ecology (239 papers), Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies (152 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (152 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (93 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (40 papers) and Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (35 papers). The most active scholars publishing in MycoKeys are John Middleton, David L. Hawksworth, Kevin D. Hyde, Chengming Tian, R. Henrik Nilsson, Leho Tedersoo, Qin Yang, Ning Jiang, Xinlei Fan and Sten Anslan.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.