Constanze Depp
Impact in
- Developmental Neuroscience top 10%
- Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Neurology top 10%
- Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
- Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
Papers in
-
- Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms 6
-
- Epigenetics and DNA Methylation 1
- Co-authors
- Alexandra I. Mot (2 shared papers)Klaus‐Armin Nave (8 shared papers)Samuel Evetts (1 shared paper)Geoffrey I. Johnston (1 shared paper)Michal Rolinski (1 shared paper)Claudio Ruffmann (1 shared paper)Amy Smith (1 shared paper)Fahd Baig (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience (2 papers)Cell Reports (1 paper)Antioxidants and Redox Signaling (1 paper)Neuron (1 paper)Alzheimer s & Dementia (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Constanze Depp
12 papers receiving 331 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Developmental Neuroscience 59
- Neurology 115
- Biological Psychiatry 16
- Neurology 61
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 65
Countries citing papers authored by Constanze Depp
This map shows the geographic impact of Constanze Depp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Constanze Depp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Constanze Depp more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Constanze Depp
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Constanze Depp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Constanze Depp. The network helps show where Constanze Depp may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Constanze Depp, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 82 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 43 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 41 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 37 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 35 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 32 | |
| 7 | 2024 | 21 | |
| 8 | 2025 | 15 | |
| 9 | 2025 | 13 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 14 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 15 | 2026 | 0 |
About Constanze Depp
Constanze Depp is a scholar working on Neurology, Molecular Biology, Physiology, Developmental Neuroscience and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 15 papers that have together received 332 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (6 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (3 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (3 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (2 papers), Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications (2 papers), Immune cells in cancer (2 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (1 paper) and Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (59 citations), Neurology (115 citations), Biological Psychiatry (16 citations), Neurology (61 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (65 citations). Constanze Depp has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Alexandra I. Mot, Klaus‐Armin Nave, Samuel Evetts, Geoffrey I. Johnston, Michal Rolinski, Claudio Ruffmann, Amy Smith, Fahd Baig, Anna Katharina Simon and Richard Wade‐Martins. Their work appears in journals such as Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, Cell Reports, Antioxidants and Redox Signaling, Neuron and Alzheimer s & Dementia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.