Constanze Depp
Impact in
- Neurology top 10%
- Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
- Developmental Neuroscience top 10%
- Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Papers in
-
- Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms 6
-
- Alzheimer's disease research and treatments 4
- Co-authors
- Alexandra I. Mot (2 shared papers)Klaus‐Armin Nave (8 shared papers)Fahd Baig (1 shared paper)Amy Smith (1 shared paper)Javier Alegre‐Abarrategui (1 shared paper)Samuel Evetts (1 shared paper)Claudio Ruffmann (1 shared paper)Anna Katharina Simon (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience (2 papers)Alzheimer s & Dementia (1 paper)Glia (1 paper)Immunity (1 paper)Molecular Psychiatry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Constanze Depp
12 papers receiving 294 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Neurology 117
- Developmental Neuroscience 54
- Biological Psychiatry 18
- Neurology 59
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 67
Countries citing papers authored by Constanze Depp
This map shows the geographic impact of Constanze Depp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Constanze Depp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Constanze Depp more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Constanze Depp
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Constanze Depp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Constanze Depp. The network helps show where Constanze Depp may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Constanze Depp, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 79 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 40 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 37 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 35 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 35 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 31 | |
| 7 | 2024 | 16 | |
| 8 | 2025 | 6 | |
| 9 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 10 | 2025 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2026 | 0 |
About Constanze Depp
Constanze Depp is a scholar working on Neurology, Physiology, Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Developmental Neuroscience, having authored 13 papers that have together received 295 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (6 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (4 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (3 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (2 papers), Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications (2 papers), Immune cells in cancer (2 papers), Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics (1 paper) and Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (117 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (54 citations), Biological Psychiatry (18 citations), Neurology (59 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (67 citations). Constanze Depp has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Alexandra I. Mot, Klaus‐Armin Nave, Fahd Baig, Amy Smith, Javier Alegre‐Abarrategui, Samuel Evetts, Claudio Ruffmann, Anna Katharina Simon, Brent J. Ryan and Geoffrey I. Johnston. Their work appears in journals such as Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, Alzheimer s & Dementia, Glia, Immunity and Molecular Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.