Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience

843 papers and 52.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 843 papers published in Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience in the last decades have received a total of 52.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience usually cover Psychiatry and Mental health (250 papers), Cognitive Neuroscience (214 papers) and Clinical Psychology (172 papers) specifically the topics of Schizophrenia research and treatment (115 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (83 papers) and Treatment of Major Depression (78 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience are Olaf Sporns, Bruce S. McEwen, Sophie Michaelis, Borwin Bandelow, Thierry Steimer, Wylie Vale, Sean M. Smith, Suzanne N. Haber, Wayne Katon and Nikolaos A. Patsopoulos.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience.

Countries where authors publish in Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025