Constanza de Dios

20 papers receiving 317 citations

Peers

Constanza de Dios
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Biological Psychiatry 107
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 56
  • Pharmacology 67
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 42
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 48
Replace Samrand Salimi with:
Samrand Salimi Iran
Lulu Cui China
Kah Kheng Goh Taiwan
Ilaria Matarazzo Italy
Sara Gibiino Italy
Weiyang Yu China
Emmanuel Jesulola Australia
Sabine El‐Halabi Canada
Anne-Marie Rees Australia
Georgina Oliver Australia
Constanza de Dios relative to Samrand Salimi Iran Samrand Salimi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Samrand Salimi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Constanza de Dios

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Constanza de Dios's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Constanza de Dios with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Constanza de Dios more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Constanza de Dios

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Constanza de Dios. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Constanza de Dios. The network helps show where Constanza de Dios may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Constanza de Dios, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Constanza de Dios Line = papers co-authored together Constanza de Dios links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020106
2 202162
3 202146
4 202119
5 202216
6 202114
7 202213
8 202110
9 20218
10 20256
11 20164
12 20244
13 20233
14 20213
15 20233
16 20202
17 20221
18 20231
19 20211
20 20241

About Constanza de Dios

Constanza de Dios is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 323 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (6 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (5 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (5 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (4 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (3 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (2 papers), Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (2 papers) and HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (107 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (56 citations), Pharmacology (67 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (42 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (48 citations). Constanza de Dios has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and United Arab Emirates. Frequent co-authors include Robert Suchting, Sudhakar Selvaraj, Jair C. Soares, Joy M. Schmitz, Scott D. Lane, Thiago Macedo e Cordeiro, Robert Dantzer, Antônio Lúcio Teixeira, Charles E. Green and Thomas R. Kosten. Their work appears in journals such as Drug and Alcohol Dependence, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, Substance Use & Misuse, Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology and Nicotine & Tobacco Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact