Constance M. Bowe

1.4k citations
30 papers · 1.2k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Constance M. Bowe

30 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Constance M. Bowe
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
  • Developmental Neuroscience 110
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 440
  • Family Practice 31
  • Neurology 239
  • Clinical Biochemistry 103
Replace Johannes L. Roos with:
Johannes L. Roos South Africa
Ingo Helbig United States
Neil A. Busis United States
Leonie Herx Canada
Scott D. Ryan Canada
Marija Heffer Croatia
Jeffery L. Johnson United States
Elisabet Sarri Spain
Petter Strømme Norway
Sherry L. Ball United States
Constance M. Bowe relative to Johannes L. Roos South Africa Johannes L. Roos's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.6×
Johannes L. Roos · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Constance M. Bowe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Constance M. Bowe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Constance M. Bowe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Constance M. Bowe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Constance M. Bowe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Constance M. Bowe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Constance M. Bowe. The network helps show where Constance M. Bowe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Constance M. Bowe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Constance M. Bowe Line = papers co-authored together Constance M. Bowe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1994109
2 2009101
3 199971
4 198670
5 198767
6 199466
7 198564
8 199560
9 200259
10 198753
11 201146
12 200142
13 200741
14 198941
15 200338
16 199337
17 200337
18 201626
19 200326
20 198721

About Constance M. Bowe

Constance M. Bowe is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Neurology, Developmental Neuroscience and Cell Biology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (9 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (7 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (5 papers), Myasthenia Gravis and Thymoma (5 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (5 papers), Cellular transport and secretion (4 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (3 papers) and Innovations in Medical Education (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (110 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (440 citations), Family Practice (31 citations), Neurology (239 citations) and Clinical Biochemistry (103 citations). Constance M. Bowe has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Jeffery D. Kocsis, Stephen G. Waxman, C. Hildebrand, John C. Voss, H. Thomas Aretz, Elizabeth Armstrong, Ricardo A. Maselli, Robert L. Wollmann, Ingela Nilsson Remahl and Marco Rizzo. Their work appears in journals such as Muscle & Nerve, Developmental Brain Research, Journal of the Neurological Sciences, Neurology and Medical Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact