Constance A. Mitchell

656 citations
36 papers · 508 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Constance A. Mitchell

33 papers receiving 502 citations

Peers

Constance A. Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 257
  • Small Animals 63
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 56
  • Physiology 12
  • Cell Biology 39
Replace Chaobo Ni with:
Chaobo Ni China
Hai-Yen Man Netherlands
Weidong Hao China
Nikolaos Parissis Belgium
Ángeles Rico-Rico Netherlands
Christopher J. Borgert United States
Xuan Yao-xian China
Susan M. Ross United States
Zhengxi Wei United States
Constance A. Mitchell relative to Chaobo Ni China Chaobo Ni's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.9×
Chaobo Ni · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Constance A. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Constance A. Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Constance A. Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Constance A. Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Constance A. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Constance A. Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Constance A. Mitchell. The network helps show where Constance A. Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Constance A. Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Constance A. Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together Constance A. Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201865
2 201965
3 201862
4 201748
5 202127
6 202425
7 201923
8 202323
9 202121
10 202220
11 201918
12 202217
13 202414
14 202310
15 20249
16 20228
17 20246
18 20256
19 20255
20 20244

About Constance A. Mitchell

Constance A. Mitchell is a scholar working on Complementary and alternative medicine, Small Animals, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Cancer Research and Plant Science, having authored 36 papers that have together received 508 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal testing and alternatives (10 papers), Phytochemistry Medicinal Plant Applications (10 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (8 papers), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (7 papers), Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact (6 papers), Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (5 papers), Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species (3 papers) and Medicinal Plants and Neuroprotection (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (257 citations), Small Animals (63 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (56 citations), Physiology (12 citations) and Cell Biology (39 citations). Constance A. Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Subham Dasgupta, David C. Volz, Zhang Sharon, Heather M. Stapleton, Sara M.F. Vliet, Aalekhya Reddam, Michelle R. Embry, Stefan Gafner, Cynthia V. Rider and Jay S. Kirkwood. Their work appears in journals such as Toxicological Sciences, Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, Pharmaceutical Biology, Environmental Science & Technology and Food and Chemical Toxicology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact