Pharmaceutical Biology

4.2k papers and 88.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 4.2k papers published in Pharmaceutical Biology in the last decades have received a total of 88.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Pharmaceutical Biology usually cover Molecular Biology (1.6k papers), Plant Science (1.5k papers) and Pharmacology (895 papers) specifically the topics of Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (620 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (617 papers) and Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (545 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Pharmaceutical Biology are Anthony Jide Afolayan, Kundan Singh Bora, Anupam Sharma, Pei Shengji, P.C.H. Hollman, John M. Pezzuto, Pharkphoom Panichayupakaranant, İlkay Erdoğan Orhan, Hong Zhang and John R. Porter.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Pharmaceutical Biology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Pharmaceutical Biology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Pharmaceutical Biology.

Countries where authors publish in Pharmaceutical Biology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Pharmaceutical Biology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Pharmaceutical Biology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pharmaceutical Biology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025