Conrad Heilmann

20 papers receiving 184 citations

Peers

Conrad Heilmann
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • General Decision Sciences 20
  • History and Philosophy of Science 16
  • Communication 21
  • Philosophy 30
  • Economics and Econometrics 59
Replace Alfred F. MacKay with:
Alfred F. MacKay United States
James R. Otteson United States
Enrico Petracca Italy
Jeffrey Barnouw United States
Amy King Australia
Max Albert Germany
Leonidas Montes Chile
Dominic Tierney United States
Pierre Demeulenaere France
Matthew Braham Germany
Conrad Heilmann relative to Alfred F. MacKay United States Alfred F. MacKay's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Alfred F. MacKay · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Conrad Heilmann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Conrad Heilmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Conrad Heilmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Conrad Heilmann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Conrad Heilmann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Conrad Heilmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Conrad Heilmann. The network helps show where Conrad Heilmann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Conrad Heilmann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Conrad Heilmann Line = papers co-authored together Conrad Heilmann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201235
2 201330
3 200625
4 201520
5 201712
6 202112
7 201511
8 202310
9 20177
10 20107
11 20185
12 20174
13 20214
14 20233
15 20242
16 20112
17 20212
18 20242
19 20222
20 20251

About Conrad Heilmann

Conrad Heilmann is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 20 papers that have together received 196 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Philosophy and Ethics (6 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (5 papers), Free Will and Agency (3 papers), Game Theory and Voting Systems (3 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (3 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (3 papers), Economic Theory and Institutions (3 papers) and Psychology of Social Influence (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (20 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (16 citations), Communication (21 citations), Philosophy (30 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (59 citations). Conrad Heilmann has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Philip S. Cook, Julian Reiss, Marta Szymanowska, François Claveau, Erwin Dekker and Jan Tinbergen. Their work appears in journals such as Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics, European Journal for Philosophy of Science, Economics and Philosophy, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A and Erkenntnis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact