Economics and Philosophy

809 papers and 11.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 809 papers published in Economics and Philosophy in the last decades have received a total of 11.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Economics and Philosophy usually cover Economics and Econometrics (385 papers), Political Science and International Relations (203 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (184 papers) specifically the topics of Economic Theory and Institutions (228 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (178 papers) and Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (134 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Economics and Philosophy are Robert Sugden, Ken Binmore, Stephen Morris, Philip Pettit, Christian List, Viktor J. Vanberg, Daniel M. Hausman, Marc Fleurbaey, Martha C. Nussbaum and Elizabeth Anderson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Economics and Philosophy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Economics and Philosophy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Economics and Philosophy.

Countries where authors publish in Economics and Philosophy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Economics and Philosophy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Economics and Philosophy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Economics and Philosophy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025