Matthew Braham
Impact in
- Philosophy top 5%
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
Papers in
-
- Political Philosophy and Ethics 6
-
- Game Theory and Voting Systems 4
- Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems 2
- Co-authors
- Martin van Hees (6 shared papers)Manfred J. Holler (3 shared papers)Friedel Bolle (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Erkenntnis (2 papers)Journal of Theoretical Politics (2 papers)The Philosophical Quarterly (1 paper)Cambridge Review of International Affairs (1 paper)Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyNetherlandsUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Matthew Braham
19 papers receiving 262 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- General Decision Sciences 14
- Philosophy 60
- Management Science and Operations Research 64
- Safety Research 40
- Economics and Econometrics 117
Countries citing papers authored by Matthew Braham
This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew Braham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew Braham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew Braham more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew Braham
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew Braham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew Braham. The network helps show where Matthew Braham may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside Matthew Braham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2004 | 49 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 48 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 42 | |
| 4 | 2008 | 34 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 24 | |
| 6 | 2002 | 14 | |
| 7 | 2000 | 14 | |
| 8 | 2006 | 12 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2005 | 9 | |
| 11 | 2006 | 7 | |
| 12 | 2009 | 5 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2014 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2006 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2003 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2006 | 1 | |
| 19 | Adam Smith's Concept of Social Welfare | 2007 | 1 |
About Matthew Braham
Matthew Braham is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Economics and Econometrics, Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience and Safety Research, having authored 19 papers that have together received 283 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Philosophy and Ethics (6 papers), Game Theory and Voting Systems (4 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (4 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (3 papers), Free Will and Agency (3 papers), Game Theory and Applications (3 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (2 papers) and Political Economy and Marxism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (14 citations), Philosophy (60 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (64 citations), Safety Research (40 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (117 citations). Matthew Braham has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Martin van Hees, Manfred J. Holler and Friedel Bolle. Their work appears in journals such as Erkenntnis, Journal of Theoretical Politics, The Philosophical Quarterly, Cambridge Review of International Affairs and Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.