Conal Smith

15 papers receiving 421 citations

Conal Smith's Hit Papers

How's life? : measuring well-being 2011 · 397 citations
3970+5+10Years since publication100200300

Peers

Conal Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Health 91
  • Social Psychology 160
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 54
  • General Health Professions 104
  • Sociology and Political Science 171
Replace Nicolás Ruiz with:
Nicolás Ruiz Colombia
Gaétan Lafortune France
Carlotta Balestra France
Romina Boarini France
Martine Durand France
Pei‐Shan Liao Taiwan
Joseph Sirgy United States
Paul Allin United Kingdom
Laura Angelescu United States
Wolfgang Glatzer Germany
Conal Smith relative to Nicolás Ruiz Colombia Nicolás Ruiz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Nicolás Ruiz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Conal Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Conal Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Conal Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Conal Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Conal Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Conal Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Conal Smith. The network helps show where Conal Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Conal Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Conal Smith Line = papers co-authored together Conal Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1
How's life? : measuring well-being
Hit paper breakdown →
2011397
2
Life in lockdown: The economic and social effect of lockdown during Alert Level 4 in New Zealand
202020
3 201314
4 201212
5 20236
6 20243
7 20152
8 19982
9 20162
10 20202
11 20151
12
Trust and Total Factor Productivity: What Do We Know About Effect Size and Causal Pathways?
20201
13 20121
14 19881
15 20131
16 20181
17 20250
18 20250

About Conal Smith

Conal Smith is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Health, Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 18 papers that have together received 466 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (7 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (5 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (2 papers), Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (1 paper), Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention (1 paper), Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (1 paper) and Torture, Ethics, and Law (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health (91 citations), Social Psychology (160 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (54 citations), General Health Professions (104 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (171 citations). Conal Smith has collaborated with scholars based in France, New Zealand and United States. Frequent co-authors include Romina Boarini, Gaétan Lafortune, Carlotta Balestra, Michael De Looper, Nicolás Ruiz, Simon Chapple, Michael Fletcher, Kate C. Prickett, Denise Scott Brown and Nguyen Anh Khoa Doan. Their work appears in journals such as Social Indicators Research, Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, Applied Research in Quality of Life and New Zealand Economic Papers.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact