Colm OBoyle

1.9k citations
48 papers · 1.5k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Colm OBoyle

46 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Colm OBoyle
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Gastroenterology 301
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 118
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 131
  • Surgery 320
  • Endocrinology 30
Replace Amir Ben‐Tov with:
Amir Ben‐Tov Israel
V. Merle France
G. Suren Arul United Kingdom
Tony Manibur Rahman United Kingdom
Abu Baker Sheikh United States
John P. May United Kingdom
Brendan J Crotty Australia
Mortada H.F. El-Shabrawi Egypt
Fahri Ovalı Türkiye
Satoko Ohfuji Japan
Colm OBoyle relative to Amir Ben‐Tov Israel Amir Ben‐Tov's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.0×
Amir Ben‐Tov · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Colm OBoyle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Colm OBoyle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Colm OBoyle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Colm OBoyle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Colm OBoyle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Colm OBoyle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Colm OBoyle. The network helps show where Colm OBoyle may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Colm OBoyle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Colm OBoyle Line = papers co-authored together Colm OBoyle links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998327
2 1999327
3 2007119
4 200299
5 200162
6 200552
7 200246
8 199845
9 199942
10 200332
11 201531
12 200728
13 200126
14 200626
15 201621
16 200120
17 200017
18 200216
19 201815
20 201313

About Colm OBoyle

Colm OBoyle is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gastroenterology, Surgery, Health and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 48 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (8 papers), Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments (6 papers), Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques (4 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (4 papers), Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology (3 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Pelvic floor disorders treatments (2 papers) and Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (301 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (118 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (131 citations), Surgery (320 citations) and Endocrinology (30 citations). Colm OBoyle has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include D. J. Johnstone, Clive J. Mitchell, Peter C. Sedman, John Macfie, J. M. Macfie, Peter Michael Sagar, David Ian Watson, C M S Royston, Glyn G. Jamieson and Cecily Begley. Their work appears in journals such as Surgical Endoscopy, Clinical Nutrition, Obesity Surgery, British journal of surgery and Gut.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact