Colin Tully

491 citations
17 papers · 307 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Colin Tully

15 papers receiving 254 citations

Peers

Colin Tully
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Software 68
  • Computer Science Applications 65
  • Information Systems 218
  • Management Information Systems 40
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 20
Replace Teade Punter with:
Teade Punter Netherlands
Steve Adolph Canada
A.M. Davis United States
Dolors Costal Spain
Pär Carlshamre Sweden
Ronald Jabangwe Sweden
Erika Nina Höhn Brazil
Martin Ivarsson Sweden
Hubert F. Hofmann United States
Dani Zweig United States
Colin Tully relative to Teade Punter Netherlands Teade Punter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Teade Punter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Colin Tully

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Colin Tully's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Colin Tully with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Colin Tully more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Colin Tully

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Colin Tully. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Colin Tully. The network helps show where Colin Tully may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Colin Tully, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Colin Tully Line = papers co-authored together Colin Tully links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2002171
2 200227
3 200223
4 200017
5 199114
6 200213
7 20028
8 19998
9
Systems Engineering of Computer-Based Systems, State of Practice Working Group.
19935
10 20035
11
System development activity
19934
12 19924
13
Real-time CASE: The Integration Battle
19894
14 19993
15 19911
16 20020
17 20020

About Colin Tully

Colin Tully is a scholar working on Information Systems, Computer Science Applications, Software, Computer Networks and Communications and Management Information Systems, having authored 17 papers that have together received 307 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (8 papers), Software Engineering Research (7 papers), Software Reliability and Analysis Research (4 papers), Open Source Software Innovations (4 papers), Software System Performance and Reliability (2 papers), Software Testing and Debugging Techniques (2 papers), Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (2 papers) and Business Process Modeling and Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Software (68 citations), Computer Science Applications (65 citations), Information Systems (218 citations), Management Information Systems (40 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (20 citations). Colin Tully has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Maurizio Morisio, Даррен Далчер, Tom DeMarco, Marc I. Kellner, Douglas L. Oliver, J. C. Holtzman, David Owens, Mack Alford, Kouichi Kishida and Bill Curtis. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Computer, IEEE Software, Systems Engineering and Software Process Improvement and Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact