Teade Punter
Impact in
- Software top 10%
- Software Reliability and Analysis Research
- Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques
-
- Open Source Software Innovations
Papers in
-
- Software Engineering Techniques and Practices 5
- Software Engineering Research 5
-
- Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies 5
- Co-authors
- Bernd Freimut (2 shared papers)Marcus Ciolkowski (2 shared papers)I. John (1 shared paper)Reinder J. Bril (2 shared papers)Pierre America (2 shared papers)David C. Watts (2 shared papers)Stefan Biffl (1 shared paper)Gerrit Müller (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Systems and Software (1 paper)Software Quality Journal (1 paper)Information and Software Technology (1 paper)Computers in Industry (1 paper)INCOSE International Symposium (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsGermanyBrazil
In The Last Decade
Teade Punter
13 papers receiving 214 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Software 52
- Computer Science Applications 53
- Information Systems 190
- Management Information Systems 45
- Artificial Intelligence 67
Countries citing papers authored by Teade Punter
This map shows the geographic impact of Teade Punter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Teade Punter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Teade Punter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Teade Punter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Teade Punter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Teade Punter. The network helps show where Teade Punter may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 18 scholars most cited alongside Teade Punter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 117 | |
| 2 | 1996 | 31 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 18 | |
| 4 | 2003 | 15 | |
| 5 | 2002 | 12 | |
| 6 | 2004 | 10 | |
| 7 | Software Measurement for Small and Medium Enterprises | 2003 | 9 |
| 8 | 2003 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2009 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2006 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2007 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2008 | 1 | |
| 14 | Software Products Evaluation | 1998 | 0 |
About Teade Punter
Teade Punter is a scholar working on Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications, Strategy and Management and Management Information Systems, having authored 14 papers that have together received 242 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (5 papers), Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (5 papers), Software Engineering Research (5 papers), Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques (2 papers), Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications (2 papers), Open Source Software Innovations (2 papers), Product Development and Customization (1 paper) and Supply Chain and Inventory Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Software (52 citations), Computer Science Applications (53 citations), Information Systems (190 citations), Management Information Systems (45 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (67 citations). Teade Punter has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Bernd Freimut, Marcus Ciolkowski, I. John, Reinder J. Bril, Pierre America, David C. Watts, Stefan Biffl, Gerrit Müller, RJ Rob Kusters and Aarnout Brombacher. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Systems and Software, Software Quality Journal, Information and Software Technology, Computers in Industry and INCOSE International Symposium.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.