IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering

326.2k citations
4.6k papers · · active since 1975

Impact in

  • Software top 0.01%
    • Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
    • Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques
    • Software Engineering Research
    • Software Engineering Techniques and Practices

Papers in

    • Software Testing and Debugging Techniques 808
    • Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques 305
    • Software Engineering Research 1.2k
    • Software Engineering Techniques and Practices 655

IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering

4.4k papers receiving 299.2k citations

Peers

IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
Comparison fields: 5 of 214
  • Software 83k
  • Information Systems 137.1k
  • Hardware and Architecture 16.5k
  • Artificial Intelligence 64.1k
  • Computer Networks and Communications 40.4k
Replace ACM Computing Surveys with:
ACM Computing Surveys United States
Computer United States
Journal of Systems and Software United States
Communications of the ACM United States
IEEE Software United States
IEEE Access China
ACM SIGPLAN Notices United States
IEEE Transactions on Computers United States
Artificial Intelligence United States
Information and Software Technology United States
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering relative to ACM Computing Surveys United States ACM Computing Surveys's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.2×
ACM Computing Surveys · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering more than expected).

Fields of papers published in IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

About IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering

The 4.6k papers published in IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering in the last decades have received a total of 326.2k indexed citations . Papers published in IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering usually cover Software (1.3k papers), Information Systems (1.8k papers), Hardware and Architecture (299 papers), Artificial Intelligence (1.1k papers) and Computer Networks and Communications (728 papers) specifically the topics of Software Engineering Research (1.2k papers), Software Testing and Debugging Techniques (808 papers), Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (655 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (522 papers), Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (440 papers), Formal Methods in Verification (305 papers), Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques (305 papers) and Distributed systems and fault tolerance (302 papers). The most active scholars publishing in IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering are BARRY W. BOEHM, Thomas J. McCabe, Gerard J. Holzmann, Chris F. Kemerer, Dorothy E. Denning, Mark Weiser, Victor Robert Basili, Elaine J. Weyuker, Shyam R. Chidamber and Lionel Briand.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact