Clément Bruno

486 citations
23 papers · 395 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

    • Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research 7
    • Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research 4

Clément Bruno

22 papers receiving 386 citations

Peers

Clément Bruno
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Biophysics 110
  • Analytical Chemistry 77
  • Neurology 99
  • Biological Psychiatry 10
  • Neurology 28
Replace Mark Noppe with:
Mark Noppe Belgium
Étienne Hanon Belgium
Joseph M. Breier United States
Ute Haußmann Germany
Michal Arbel Israel
Santiago Solé‐Domènech United States
Ganna Shevchenko Sweden
Robert P. Mason United Kingdom
Alice A. Brandli Australia
Pierrette Dayhaw‐Barker United States
Clément Bruno relative to Mark Noppe Belgium Mark Noppe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15.7×
Mark Noppe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Clément Bruno

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Clément Bruno's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clément Bruno with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clément Bruno more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Clément Bruno

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clément Bruno. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clément Bruno. The network helps show where Clément Bruno may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Clément Bruno, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Clément Bruno Line = papers co-authored together Clément Bruno links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201852
2 201644
3 201944
4 201637
5 201936
6 201728
7 201727
8 201819
9 202018
10 202117
11 202215
12 201613
13 201910
14 20218
15 20168
16 20256
17 20244
18 20153
19 20232
20 20212

About Clément Bruno

Clément Bruno is a scholar working on Neurology, Biophysics, Clinical Biochemistry, Analytical Chemistry and Genetics, having authored 23 papers that have together received 395 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research (7 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (5 papers), Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (4 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (4 papers), Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research (4 papers), Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research (3 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (2 papers) and Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (110 citations), Analytical Chemistry (77 citations), Neurology (99 citations), Biological Psychiatry (10 citations) and Neurology (28 citations). Clément Bruno has collaborated with scholars based in France, United Kingdom and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Hélène Blasco, Franck Bonnier, Hugh James Byrne, Christian Robert Andres, Patrick Vourc’h, Igor Chourpa, Franck Patin, Philippe Corcia, Matthew J. Baker and Jennifer McIntyre. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Biochemistry, The Analyst, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Drug Testing and Analysis and Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact