C.J. Straker

905 citations
28 papers · 650 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

C.J. Straker

28 papers receiving 590 citations

Peers

C.J. Straker
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Plant Science 480
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 97
  • Soil Science 71
  • Pollution 74
  • Pharmacology 99
Replace Iris Charvat with:
Iris Charvat United States
Hervé Dupré de Boulois Belgium
Heather D. Toler United States
Christine Le Roux France
Mitiku Habte United States
Cécile Thonar Switzerland
Gisela Dı́az Spain
E. Torrecillas Spain
Lewis Melville Canada
A. Trotta Italy
C.J. Straker relative to Iris Charvat United States Iris Charvat's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Iris Charvat · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C.J. Straker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C.J. Straker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C.J. Straker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C.J. Straker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C.J. Straker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C.J. Straker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C.J. Straker. The network helps show where C.J. Straker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C.J. Straker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C.J. Straker Line = papers co-authored together C.J. Straker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004112
2 199980
3 199672
4 198647
5 200942
6 201135
7 199834
8 200221
9 198519
10 200719
11 201417
12 199717
13 201214
14 198712
15 198911
16 200711
17 199910
18 201310
19
Does microsymbiont-host specificity determine plant species turnover and speciation in Gondwanan shrublands? A hypothesis.
19909
20 19929

About C.J. Straker

C.J. Straker is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Pharmacology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 650 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (15 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (6 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (5 papers), Heavy metals in environment (4 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (4 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (4 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (3 papers) and Lichen and fungal ecology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (480 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (97 citations), Soil Science (71 citations), Pollution (74 citations) and Pharmacology (99 citations). C.J. Straker has collaborated with scholars based in South Africa, France and Romania. Frequent co-authors include Isabel Weiersbye, Vincent M. Gray, D. T. Mitchell, W.J. Przybyłowicz, Arnaud T. Djami‐Tchatchou, Joanna Felicity Dames, Mary C. Scholes, M. E. C. Rey, Alan T. Critchley and E.T.F. Witkowski. Their work appears in journals such as Mycorrhiza, New Phytologist, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, Annals of Botany and Applied Soil Ecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact