D. T. Mitchell

3.3k citations
77 papers · 2.9k · 1 hit paper · h-index 28

Impact in

Papers in

D. T. Mitchell

76 papers receiving 2.5k citations

D. T. Mitchell's Hit Papers

Environmental Phosphorus Handbook. 1973 · 380 citations
3800+17+35Years since publication100200300

Peers

D. T. Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 829
  • Plant Science 1.7k
  • Soil Science 337
  • Insect Science 354
  • Environmental Chemistry 277
Replace Walter C. Shortle with:
Walter C. Shortle United States
Warwick B. Silvester New Zealand
S. Visser Canada
Ursula Falkengren‐Grerup Sweden
Y. Waisel Israel
Pierre Meerts Belgium
Amram Eshel Israel
Shaolin Peng China
Filippo Bussotti Italy
Dudley J. Raynal United States
D. T. Mitchell relative to Walter C. Shortle United States Walter C. Shortle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×
Walter C. Shortle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by D. T. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D. T. Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. T. Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. T. Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D. T. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. T. Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. T. Mitchell. The network helps show where D. T. Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside D. T. Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with D. T. Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together D. T. Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 77 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Environmental Phosphorus Handbook.
Hit paper breakdown →
1973380
2 1983346
3 2012253
4 1985220
5 1987110
6 200181
7 200070
8 198767
9 198166
10 198664
11 198658
12 198457
13 198651
14 198348
15 199646
16 198443
17 200641
18 200636
19 199335
20 197834

About D. T. Mitchell

D. T. Mitchell is a scholar working on Plant Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Soil Science, having authored 77 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (40 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (15 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (11 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (10 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (9 papers), Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis (9 papers), Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism (8 papers) and Plant and fungal interactions (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (829 citations), Plant Science (1.7k citations), Soil Science (337 citations), Insect Science (354 citations) and Environmental Chemistry (277 citations). D. T. Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, South Africa and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include J. U. M. Jarvis, Alfred M. Beeton, Edward J. Griffith, Bruce Osborne, E.T.F. Witkowski, D. J. Read, F. J. Kruger, C. H. Gimingham, R.C. Cooke and Fiona M. Doohan. Their work appears in journals such as New Phytologist, Mycorrhiza, Journal of Ecology, Forest Pathology and Scientia Horticulturae.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact