Cindy Nash
Impact in
- Health top 5%
- Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Child Abuse and Trauma
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Migration, Health and Trauma
Papers in
-
- Child Abuse and Trauma 4
- Suicide and Self-Harm Studies 1
- Health 4
- Intimate Partner and Family Violence 4
- Co-authors
- David DiLillo (5 shared papers)Michelle A. Fortier (2 shared papers)Angèle Fauchier (2 shared papers)Andrea Perry (2 shared papers)Sarah DeGue (2 shared papers)David J. Hansen (1 shared paper)Calvin P. Garbin (1 shared paper)Sarah A. Hayes (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Violence and Victims (2 papers)Early Childhood Education Journal (1 paper)Journal of Aggression Maltreatment & Trauma (1 paper)Journal of Family Violence (1 paper)Assessment (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Cindy Nash
8 papers receiving 297 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Health 84
- Clinical Psychology 203
- Gender Studies 54
- Statistics and Probability 32
- Safety Research 21
Countries citing papers authored by Cindy Nash
This map shows the geographic impact of Cindy Nash's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cindy Nash with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cindy Nash more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cindy Nash
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cindy Nash. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cindy Nash. The network helps show where Cindy Nash may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 13 scholars most cited alongside Cindy Nash, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2006 | 74 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 74 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 63 | |
| 4 | 2003 | 47 | |
| 5 | 1997 | 42 | |
| 6 | 2006 | 10 | |
| 7 | Reliability, validity, and factor structure of the psychological abuse and neglect scales of the Computer Assisted Maltreatment Inventory (CAMI) | 2005 | 5 |
| 8 | 2012 | 3 |
About Cindy Nash
Cindy Nash is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Health, General Health Professions, Demography and Gender Studies, having authored 8 papers that have together received 318 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Abuse and Trauma (4 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (4 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (2 papers), Elder Abuse and Neglect (2 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (1 paper), Cyberloafing and Workplace Behavior (1 paper), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (1 paper) and Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health (84 citations), Clinical Psychology (203 citations), Gender Studies (54 citations), Statistics and Probability (32 citations) and Safety Research (21 citations). Cindy Nash has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include David DiLillo, Michelle A. Fortier, Angèle Fauchier, Andrea Perry, Sarah DeGue, David J. Hansen, Calvin P. Garbin, Sarah A. Hayes, Sarah A. Hayes‐Skelton and Emily V. Trask. Their work appears in journals such as Violence and Victims, Early Childhood Education Journal, Journal of Aggression Maltreatment & Trauma, Journal of Family Violence and Assessment.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.