Chulmin Cho
Impact in
- Reproductive Medicine top 10%
- Sperm and Testicular Function
Papers in
-
- Pain Mechanisms and Treatments 6
- Alzheimer's disease research and treatments 2
-
- Ion channel regulation and function 2
- Co-authors
- Loren J. Martin (6 shared papers)Hemant K. Paudel (3 shared papers)Hamid Y. Qureshi (1 shared paper)Tong Li (1 shared paper)Nicole Leclerc (1 shared paper)Yong‐An Lee (3 shared papers)Buom‐Yong Ryu (3 shared papers)Chul Geun Kim (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Current Biology (1 paper)Molecules and Cells (1 paper)Pain (1 paper)The Journal of Biochemistry (1 paper)Journal of Animal Science (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaSouth KoreaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Chulmin Cho
14 papers receiving 313 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Reproductive Medicine 42
- Behavioral Neuroscience 17
- Small Animals 30
- Physiology 98
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 49
Countries citing papers authored by Chulmin Cho
This map shows the geographic impact of Chulmin Cho's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chulmin Cho with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chulmin Cho more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Chulmin Cho
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chulmin Cho. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chulmin Cho. The network helps show where Chulmin Cho may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chulmin Cho, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 66 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 52 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 37 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 34 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 23 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 16 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 14 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 14 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 14 | |
| 10 | 1997 | 12 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 11 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 11 | |
| 13 | 2012 | 9 | |
| 14 | 2010 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 0 |
About Chulmin Cho
Chulmin Cho is a scholar working on Physiology, Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Genetics, having authored 15 papers that have together received 316 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (6 papers), Animal Genetics and Reproduction (3 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (3 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (2 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (2 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (2 papers) and Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (42 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (17 citations), Small Animals (30 citations), Physiology (98 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (49 citations). Chulmin Cho has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, South Korea and United States. Frequent co-authors include Loren J. Martin, Hemant K. Paudel, Hamid Y. Qureshi, Tong Li, Nicole Leclerc, Yong‐An Lee, Buom‐Yong Ryu, Chul Geun Kim, Bang‐Jin Kim and Yong-Hee Kim. Their work appears in journals such as Current Biology, Molecules and Cells, Pain, The Journal of Biochemistry and Journal of Animal Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.