Christopher Mason
Impact in
- Genetics top 5%
- Mesenchymal stem cell research
-
- Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Mark O. Clements (2 shared papers)Richard O. C. Oreffo (1 shared paper)Cyrus Cooper (1 shared paper)Sowmya Viswanathan (1 shared paper)David F. Stroncek (1 shared paper)D. J. Weiss (1 shared paper)Glyn Stacey (1 shared paper)Darwin J. Prockop (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Stem Cells and Development (3 papers)Blood (2 papers)American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine (1 paper)Tissue Engineering (1 paper)Regenerative Medicine (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomItaly
In The Last Decade
Christopher Mason
12 papers receiving 480 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Genetics 164
- Biomaterials 50
- Urology 19
- Surgery 128
- Biomedical Engineering 126
Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Mason
This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Mason's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Mason with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Mason more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Mason
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Mason. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Mason. The network helps show where Christopher Mason may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christopher Mason, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 172 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 97 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 71 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 68 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 28 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 16 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 16 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 14 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 10 | Precisely delivered nano-mechanical forces induce blebbing in undifferentiated mouse embryonic stem cells | 2011 | 2 |
| 11 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 1 |
About Christopher Mason
Christopher Mason is a scholar working on Surgery, Genetics, Molecular Biology, Biomedical Engineering and Oncology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 493 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (4 papers), 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (3 papers), Mesenchymal stem cell research (3 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (2 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (2 papers), Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research (1 paper), Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (1 paper) and Corneal Surgery and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (164 citations), Biomaterials (50 citations), Urology (19 citations), Surgery (128 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (126 citations). Christopher Mason has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Mark O. Clements, Richard O. C. Oreffo, Cyrus Cooper, Sowmya Viswanathan, David F. Stroncek, D. J. Weiss, Glyn Stacey, Darwin J. Prockop, Peiman Hematti and Robert Deans. Their work appears in journals such as Stem Cells and Development, Blood, American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.