Regenerative Medicine

1.3k papers and 25.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.3k papers published in Regenerative Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 25.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Regenerative Medicine usually cover Molecular Biology (522 papers), Surgery (432 papers) and Physiology (348 papers) specifically the topics of Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (374 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (324 papers) and Mesenchymal stem cell research (316 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Regenerative Medicine are Todd C. McDevitt, Priya R. Baraniak, Sai Kiang Lim, Ruenn Chai Lai, Chris Mason, George T.‐J. Huang, Tian Sheng Chen, Elliot L. Chaikof, Swathi Ravi and Damien P. Kuffler.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Regenerative Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Regenerative Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Regenerative Medicine.

Countries where authors publish in Regenerative Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Regenerative Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Regenerative Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Regenerative Medicine more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025