Christopher Kent

1.1k citations
39 papers · 532 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Christopher Kent

32 papers receiving 382 citations

Peers

Christopher Kent
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • History 107
  • Space and Planetary Science 13
  • History and Philosophy of Science 28
  • Religious studies 27
  • Anthropology 51
Replace Bonnie G. Smith with:
Bonnie G. Smith United States
David Potter United States
Peter Bakewell United States
Paul R. Mullins United States
Ulbe Bosma Netherlands
Thomas Pakenham
Philip J. Ethington United States
Laurence Fontaine France
Michael Simpson United Kingdom
Cedric Belfrage
Christopher Kent relative to Bonnie G. Smith United States Bonnie G. Smith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Bonnie G. Smith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Kent

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Kent's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Kent with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Kent more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Kent

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Kent. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Kent. The network helps show where Christopher Kent may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christopher Kent, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher Kent Line = papers co-authored together Christopher Kent links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1982114
2 198887
3 200243
4 198738
5 200436
6 197832
7 200529
8
The Perfect Gift
201323
9 197923
10 199320
11 201717
12 200516
13 201613
14 19965
15 19795
16 20044
17 19893
18 19863
19 19942
20 19992

About Christopher Kent

Christopher Kent is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, History, Economics and Econometrics, Molecular Biology and Pollution, having authored 39 papers that have together received 532 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (4 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (4 papers), Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal (3 papers), Diverse Musicological Studies (2 papers), Global trade and economics (2 papers), Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (2 papers), Race, History, and American Society (2 papers) and Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (107 citations), Space and Planetary Science (13 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (28 citations), Religious studies (27 citations) and Anthropology (51 citations). Christopher Kent has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Frank Prochaska, Philippa Levine, Christopher J. Hewitt, Alberto Reis, J. Carlos Roseiro, Teresa Lopes da Silva, Reba N. Soffer, Maria R. Kosseva, Małgorzata Krzywonos and Tadeusz Miśkiewicz. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Journal of History, History of European Ideas, The Journal of Interdisciplinary History and Crystal Growth & Design.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact