Michael Simpson

42 papers receiving 520 citations

Peers

Michael Simpson
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Geography, Planning and Development 69
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 104
  • Anthropology 70
  • Literature and Literary Theory 67
  • Urban Studies 33
Replace Julie Sze with:
Julie Sze United States
John A. Jakle United States
Nicholas Shapiro United States
Christopher A. Airriess United States
Levi Van Sant United States
Allen G. Noble United States
David Schuyler United States
Lindsey Dillon United States
Natalie Osborne Australia
Suzanne Scheld United States
Michael Simpson relative to Julie Sze United States Julie Sze's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×5×
Julie Sze · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Simpson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Simpson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Simpson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Simpson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Simpson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Simpson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Simpson. The network helps show where Michael Simpson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Simpson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Simpson Line = papers co-authored together Michael Simpson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016100
2 201755
3 201851
4 201751
5 202237
6
Thomas Adams and the modern planning movement : Britain, Canada, and the United States, 1900-1940
198530
7 200230
8 201929
9 200729
10 201825
11 202219
12 200315
13 202115
14 200712
15 200712
16 202311
17 196911
18 20227
19 19806
20 20244

About Michael Simpson

Michael Simpson is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology, Literature and Literary Theory, Political Science and International Relations and Health, having authored 58 papers that have together received 597 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights (5 papers), Philippine History and Culture (4 papers), Water Governance and Infrastructure (4 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (3 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (3 papers), Moravian Church and William Blake (3 papers), Mining and Resource Management (3 papers) and Military History and Strategy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (69 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (104 citations), Anthropology (70 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (67 citations) and Urban Studies (33 citations). Michael Simpson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Nathan McClintock, Dillon Mahmoudi, Barbara Goff, Charles R. Warren, Darren McCauley, Terry Lamb, Philippe Le Billon, Jeremy Sizer, Max Ritts and Lydia E. S. Cole. Their work appears in journals such as The Wordsworth Circle, Environment and Planning D Society and Space, British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The Heythrop Journal and Romanticism.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact