Christopher J. Boyce

27 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Christopher J. Boyce
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • General Decision Sciences 129
  • Health 386
  • Applied Psychology 224
  • Social Psychology 981
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 287
Replace Liam Delaney with:
Liam Delaney Ireland
Jan‐Emmanuel De Neve United Kingdom
Ashley V. Whillans United States
David Richter Germany
Dan Coates United States
Stefanie Schurer Australia
Phanikiran Radhakrishnan United States
Bonnie Hayden Cheng Hong Kong
Eugenio Proto United Kingdom
Mariano Rojas Mexico
Christopher J. Boyce relative to Liam Delaney Ireland Liam Delaney's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Liam Delaney · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher J. Boyce

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher J. Boyce's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher J. Boyce with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher J. Boyce more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher J. Boyce

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher J. Boyce. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher J. Boyce. The network helps show where Christopher J. Boyce may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Christopher J. Boyce, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher J. Boyce Line = papers co-authored together Christopher J. Boyce links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010497
2 2010196
3 2012181
4 2015159
5 2013121
6 2011102
7 201192
8 201182
9 200967
10 201462
11 201660
12 201642
13 201840
14 201135
15 202033
16 201733
17 201832
18 201632
19 201628
20 201422

About Christopher J. Boyce

Christopher J. Boyce is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology, Economics and Econometrics and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 29 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (16 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (10 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (6 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (4 papers), Income, Poverty, and Inequality (4 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers), Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis (3 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (129 citations), Health (386 citations), Applied Psychology (224 citations), Social Psychology (981 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (287 citations). Christopher J. Boyce has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and France. Frequent co-authors include Alex M. Wood, Gordon D. A. Brown, Simon Moore, Michael Daly, Nattavudh Powdthavee, Constantine Sedikides, Liam Delaney, Eamonn Ferguson, Andrew E. Clark and James Banks. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Science, Journal of Applied Psychology, Journal of Affective Disorders, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin and Social Indicators Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact