John Stokes

1.6k citations
104 papers · 926 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

John Stokes

79 papers receiving 649 citations

Peers

John Stokes
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 213
  • Literature and Literary Theory 231
  • Music 63
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 73
  • Museology 41
Replace Mark Anderson with:
Mark Anderson United States
Michael Becker Brazil
Taylor Arnold United States
Elisabeth Sussman Canada
Thomas M. Leonard United States
Michael Biggs United Kingdom
Nicholas J. Bailey United Kingdom
K.J. Rawson United States
Andrew Harrison United States
Slobodan Marković Serbia
John Stokes relative to Mark Anderson United States Mark Anderson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×20×40×60×73×
Mark Anderson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Stokes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Stokes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Stokes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Stokes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Stokes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Stokes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Stokes. The network helps show where John Stokes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Stokes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Stokes Line = papers co-authored together John Stokes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 104 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004143
2 199767
3
Women, Theatre and Performance: New Histories, New Historiographies
200053
4 200744
5 198943
6
Reflecting the audience - London theatregoing, 1840-1880
200235
7 201632
8 200132
9 201728
10 201127
11 199626
12 201821
13
In the nineties
198919
14 199218
15 198217
16 201616
17 198516
18 198414
19 201712
20 199312

About John Stokes

John Stokes is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Computational Mechanics, Sociology and Political Science, Aerospace Engineering and Museology, having authored 104 papers that have together received 926 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (12 papers), Historical Art and Culture Studies (9 papers), Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics (9 papers), Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies (8 papers), Turbomachinery Performance and Optimization (6 papers), Combustion and flame dynamics (6 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (6 papers) and Modernist Literature and Criticism (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (213 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (231 citations), Music (63 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (73 citations) and Museology (41 citations). John Stokes has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Richard H. Osborne, Andreas Schamel, T. H. Lake, Linda Dowling, Zahir Tari, Stefano Spaccapietra, Stephen Adams, Steven Begg, Martin Gold and Jonas A. Barish. Their work appears in journals such as The Modern Language Review, SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series, Sports, The Spine Journal and Research & Politics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact